Accuracy & factuality
Verify correctness, sourcing, and factual grounding of generated answers.
Evaluate
Rigorous human assessment of your model's responses — accuracy, safety, helpfulness, and alignment with your standards.
Overview
AI Output Evaluation puts trained human reviewers behind your model's responses, scoring each one against your rubric so you know precisely where quality is strong and where it breaks down. We deliver structured, defensible judgments — not crowd-sourced guesses — with second-level QA on every batch.
What's included
Verify correctness, sourcing, and factual grounding of generated answers.
Flag harmful, unsafe, or policy-violating outputs against your guidelines.
Assess whether responses actually solve the user's request.
Check voice, style, and alignment with brand and client standards.
Rank and compare model versions or candidates side by side.
Stress-test responses on hard, ambiguous, and adversarial cases.
How it works
We define the task, the rubric, and the quality bar with your team before any work begins.
Domain-matched, trained reviewers are assigned and calibrated through the Intellego engine.
Work runs under managed workflows with second-level QA and client-specific rubrics on every batch.
You receive QA-checked output with measurable accuracy reporting — not just raw labels.
Start with a controlled pilot
Run a scoped pilot, measure the quality, then scale once it's proven.